Law Offices of Steven J. Klearman & Associates - 437 W. Plumb Lane  Reno, Nevada 89509
Map
(775) 323-3700 (800) 880-LAWS
Recent Posts
Categories
Archives
Nevada Auto Accidents
Nevada Truck Accidents
Nevada Motorcycle Accidents
Nevada Wrongful Death
Nevada Slip and Fall
Nevada Product Defects
Nevada Unsafe Property
Nevada Sexual Molestation
Nevada Dog Bites
 
« Nevada Hospital Managers Face Theft Charges | Main  | University Medical Center Does Deal with Cancer Institute »
  Pregnant Women Get More Imaging Exams

Pregnant women are receiving more high-tech imaging exams, exposing their babies to higher doses of radiation than a decade ago, a study said on Tuesday.

Reuters reports that while the levels of radiation exposure are low, they carry a slight risk of harm to the developing fetus, said study author Elizabeth Lazarus, a professor of diagnostic imaging at the Warren Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island.

A review of 5,235 imaging examinations performed on pregnant women at Brown from 1997 to 2006 found the number of those exams rose 121 percent. The exams included computed tomography (CT), nuclear medicine and plain film X-rays.

An abdominal ultrasound, a routine exam performed during pregnancy, does not expose the patient to ionizing radiation, which can cause cell damage.

CT exams, which deliver more radiation than other procedures, saw the greatest increase in use, rising by about 25 percent a year. Use of X-rays increased 7 percent a year, and nuclear medical exams rose by 12 percent annually.

CT scans are used in pregnancy only to detect potentially life-threatening conditions such as bleeding in the brain, blood clots in the lungs or appendicitis.

Researchers estimated the average fetal radiation exposure for CT was 0.69 rads, compared to 0.04 rads for nuclear tests and 0.0015 rads for X-rays. The data were released at a meeting of the Radiological Society of North America in Chicago.

"A patient being recommended for a test like this should talk to their doctor to find out if there are any alternative tests or if there is any harm waiting," Lazarus said in an interview.

"But if one of these tests is needed, we would not discourage any patients from undergoing one, because making a diagnosis could also be life-saving."

(Reporting by Susan Kelly, editing by Philip Barbara)

Categories: Medical Issues

Posted By Steven J. Klearman on November 27, 2007 01:49 pm | Permalink 
earn More About The Law Books That Steve Has Published


Reno Attorneys
Contact Steven J. Klearman & Associates

The information on this Reno Attorney / Law Firm website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this or associated pages, documents, comments, answers, emails, or other communications should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information on this website is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing of this information does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

Address: 437 W. Plumb Lane   Reno Nevada 89509   Phone: (775) 323-3700 Toll Free: (800) 880-Laws
Administration